Skip to main content

3.4 EPA


1. What are the disadvantages for Scott Pruitt of using rule making?
The rule-making process is slow and requires many steps like collecting public input and can be slowed down by lawsuits.
2. How has the enforcement of environmental regulations changed from the Obama Administration to the Trump Administration?
The enforcement is much less strict under the Trump administration. For example, the agency has not said anything about counties that failed to meet ozone restrictions by the October 17 deadline.
3. What change has Pruitt made to the process for investigating potential violations of environmental regulations? 
 The enforcement division is required to get permission from headquarters before carrying out an investigation.
4. How many environmental regulations has Pruitt removed?
He has tried to roll back at least 19 environmental regulations
5. Why are some people critical of having so many environmental regulations?
They think it is bad for business and thus hurts the economy and America's competitiveness in the global markets. Some regulations supposedly cost too much for businesses to comply with the regulations.
6. How have the courts limited Pruitt's plans?
Courts have blocked attempts to deregulate, such as by preventing the EPA's attempt to suspend methane regulations.
7. What are state governments doing to try to limit Pruitt's plans?
States are suing the EPA for their failure to expand ozone regulations, lack of control of air pollution crossing state line, and numerous other issues. 
8. How is the Senate working to try to limit Pruitt's plans?
Senate Democrats are ready to interrogate Pruitt when he testifies before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. They are also preparing for if they win the majority by assembling a new agenda for the EPA administrator.

(article: https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/1/29/16684952/epa-scott-pruitt-director-regulations)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.3 Media Coverage of Trump

1. What three observations did the study find about media outlets with a right leaning audience? These media outlets hard reporters who were less likely to challenge what the president said, offered fewer negative and more positive evaluations of Trump, and used fewer types of sources for the reporting. 2. How did right leaning media outlets and left leaning media outlets use sources differently? The right leaning media tends not to use Trump and his administration, outside experts, or interest groups. On the other hand, left leaning audience outlets used a variety of sources, with 70% containing two or more types of sources. 3. How much more likely were left leaning outlets to include negative coverage of Trump? Left leaning outlets were three times more likely to cover Trump negatively compared to right leaning sources. 4. How often did left leaning and right leaning outlets refute something said by Trump? It was 7 times more common in left leaning outlets than in...
Post a Comment
Read more

1.7 Does Campaigning Work?

1.  What was the overall general finding of Broockman and Kalla’s analysis of campaign activities? Campaigning basically has no effect on people's general election choices. 2.  What two time frames did Broockman and Kalla analyze in their study? They looked at within 2 months of the election and also at longer than 2 months before the election. 3.  At what rate did they find that people were actually persuaded with campaign activities close to the election? The rate was about 1 in 800 people reached was persuaded. This is almost 0. 4. How were the results different in the study between activities months before the election, and those that occur close to the election day? Campaigning has almost no chance of persuading people when it is close to the election because almost everyone has already decided who to vote for, often based on parties, and cannot be moved by  these methods. Earlier, campaigns are more effective in changing opinions, but ...
Post a Comment
Read more

4.3 This Week in Civil Rights

1. What question will be added to the Census in 2020? It will ask people to say which people in the household are citizens. 2. How does the government justify this addition? They say it will give more information about the United States. 3. Why do people have a problem with this addition? It could decrease the responses of people who are immigrants, particularly those who are not legal residents, of the United States and thus give an inaccurate count of population while allocating funding and determining congressional districts. 4. Why is it important to states that the undocumented immigrants that live there answer the Census? 5. What limit is put on the Census bureau to prevent the problems people are concerned about? 6. How are both critics of Trump and the Trump administration technically correct about this particular question on the Census? In previous years, the question about citizenship has appeared on a survey that is only sent to a small percentage of...
Post a Comment
Read more