Skip to main content

3.1 Trump Voter Fraud and Marijuana



1. Why did the Trump administration decide to end the Voter Fraud  Commission?
States resisted the commission's requests for extensive voter information. 
2. What claims had Trump made about voter fraud?
He claimed that there was substantial evidence for voter fraud and that millions of fraudulent votes had cost him the popular vote
3. What rate of voter fraud was found by a Loyola Law School study?
 A few hundred ballots at most over 15 years during which over 800 million votes were cast.
4. What rate of voter fraud did the North Carolina Board of Elections find?
(North Carolina has some of the strictest voter laws in the country)
only 0.00002 percent
5. What information does Trump base his claims on?
His claims are based on a misinterpretation of a 2012 Pew Center that addressed the technology used for voter registration that retained deceased and relocated voters on the rosters.
6. Why do Republicans continue to emphasize the danger of voter fraud?
It allows them to establish laws that make it harder for people to vote. Usually, these laws disenfranchise populations, like racial minorities young people, that tend to vote Democratic, so it helps give the Republican party an advantage.

(article: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/30/15900478/trump-voter-fraud-suppression-commission)

7.  How has Attorney General Jeff Sessions changed federal marijuana law enforcement?
He revoked the Obama administration's guidelines for states to legalize marijuana with little federal interference. He allows federal judges to prosecute marijuana businesses.
8. How did the Obama administration treat this issue?
 They took a soft approach and allowed states to legalize marijuana after meeting some guidelines.
9. What did the "Cole memo" say?
It allowed for states to experiment with legalizing marijuana by saying that as long as states enforced guidelines, like preventing marijuana from leaving the state and preventing children from using it, the federal government would not intervene.
10. What impact could these changes have on states that have legalized marijuana?
It could create chaos as people lose jobs and the government loses tax revenues. Also, since law enforcement would be regulated by different federal judges, there is no clear standard.
11. How can Congress change the impact of this enforcement?
Congress could instead legalize marijuana federally and let states choose what policies they want within their borders. It could also pass legislation limiting federal regulation, as has already been done for medical marijuana.
12. Why might Sessions's actions provoke a backlash from Republicans?
His actions are opposite to what voters chose as legalization came from ballot initiatives. Furthermore, even a majority of Republicans favor legalization

(article:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/1/4/16849866/marijuana-legalization-trump-sessions-cole-memo)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.3 Media Coverage of Trump

1. What three observations did the study find about media outlets with a right leaning audience? These media outlets hard reporters who were less likely to challenge what the president said, offered fewer negative and more positive evaluations of Trump, and used fewer types of sources for the reporting. 2. How did right leaning media outlets and left leaning media outlets use sources differently? The right leaning media tends not to use Trump and his administration, outside experts, or interest groups. On the other hand, left leaning audience outlets used a variety of sources, with 70% containing two or more types of sources. 3. How much more likely were left leaning outlets to include negative coverage of Trump? Left leaning outlets were three times more likely to cover Trump negatively compared to right leaning sources. 4. How often did left leaning and right leaning outlets refute something said by Trump? It was 7 times more common in left leaning outlets than in...
Post a Comment
Read more

1.7 Does Campaigning Work?

1.  What was the overall general finding of Broockman and Kalla’s analysis of campaign activities? Campaigning basically has no effect on people's general election choices. 2.  What two time frames did Broockman and Kalla analyze in their study? They looked at within 2 months of the election and also at longer than 2 months before the election. 3.  At what rate did they find that people were actually persuaded with campaign activities close to the election? The rate was about 1 in 800 people reached was persuaded. This is almost 0. 4. How were the results different in the study between activities months before the election, and those that occur close to the election day? Campaigning has almost no chance of persuading people when it is close to the election because almost everyone has already decided who to vote for, often based on parties, and cannot be moved by  these methods. Earlier, campaigns are more effective in changing opinions, but ...
Post a Comment
Read more

4.3 This Week in Civil Rights

1. What question will be added to the Census in 2020? It will ask people to say which people in the household are citizens. 2. How does the government justify this addition? They say it will give more information about the United States. 3. Why do people have a problem with this addition? It could decrease the responses of people who are immigrants, particularly those who are not legal residents, of the United States and thus give an inaccurate count of population while allocating funding and determining congressional districts. 4. Why is it important to states that the undocumented immigrants that live there answer the Census? 5. What limit is put on the Census bureau to prevent the problems people are concerned about? 6. How are both critics of Trump and the Trump administration technically correct about this particular question on the Census? In previous years, the question about citizenship has appeared on a survey that is only sent to a small percentage of...
Post a Comment
Read more