Skip to main content

2.5 Lisa Murkowski


1. Which two senators does the article single out as being potential obstacles to the passing of the tax bill & where are they from?
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine
2. What indications has Murkowski made about how she may vote on this tax bill?
She has remained noncommittal in her responses to questions about how she will vote.
3. What did Republicans add to the bill that would specifically encourage Murkowski to vote for the bill?
They included a provision to allow oil drilling in Alaska's Arctic Wildlife Natural Refuge.
4. Why would Murkowski be more likely to support the bill if it adds this provision?
It would bring significant revenue to her state and probably also make her popular for future reelections.
5. Why does Murkowski support "Obamacare" if she is a Republican?
It has decreased the percentage of uninsured people in her state, which is a good thing.
6. How long has drilling in this part of Alaska been banned?
37 years, ever since 1980 when President Carter required any drilling in the AWNR to be preceded by an environmental impact study and approval from Congress
7. What benefit do Alaskan citizens get each year from the resources in their state?
They receive a check for around $2,200 from the state's Permanent Fund
8. How & why would Murkowski vote if she acts as a "delegate", a "trustee", and a "partisan"?
As a delegate, she would probably vote for the tax plan to reap the benefits of the oil drilling, a favorite of the state residents, because delegates do what the constituency wants. As a trustee, she would probably vote against it because she seems personally concerned about the health care changes, and trustees vote based on their personal positions. As a partisan, she would have to vote for it because she is Republican, and tax reform is a huge priority for her party.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2.3 Media Coverage of Trump

1. What three observations did the study find about media outlets with a right leaning audience? These media outlets hard reporters who were less likely to challenge what the president said, offered fewer negative and more positive evaluations of Trump, and used fewer types of sources for the reporting. 2. How did right leaning media outlets and left leaning media outlets use sources differently? The right leaning media tends not to use Trump and his administration, outside experts, or interest groups. On the other hand, left leaning audience outlets used a variety of sources, with 70% containing two or more types of sources. 3. How much more likely were left leaning outlets to include negative coverage of Trump? Left leaning outlets were three times more likely to cover Trump negatively compared to right leaning sources. 4. How often did left leaning and right leaning outlets refute something said by Trump? It was 7 times more common in left leaning outlets than in...

1.7 Does Campaigning Work?

1.  What was the overall general finding of Broockman and Kalla’s analysis of campaign activities? Campaigning basically has no effect on people's general election choices. 2.  What two time frames did Broockman and Kalla analyze in their study? They looked at within 2 months of the election and also at longer than 2 months before the election. 3.  At what rate did they find that people were actually persuaded with campaign activities close to the election? The rate was about 1 in 800 people reached was persuaded. This is almost 0. 4. How were the results different in the study between activities months before the election, and those that occur close to the election day? Campaigning has almost no chance of persuading people when it is close to the election because almost everyone has already decided who to vote for, often based on parties, and cannot be moved by  these methods. Earlier, campaigns are more effective in changing opinions, but ...

4.3 This Week in Civil Rights

1. What question will be added to the Census in 2020? It will ask people to say which people in the household are citizens. 2. How does the government justify this addition? They say it will give more information about the United States. 3. Why do people have a problem with this addition? It could decrease the responses of people who are immigrants, particularly those who are not legal residents, of the United States and thus give an inaccurate count of population while allocating funding and determining congressional districts. 4. Why is it important to states that the undocumented immigrants that live there answer the Census? 5. What limit is put on the Census bureau to prevent the problems people are concerned about? 6. How are both critics of Trump and the Trump administration technically correct about this particular question on the Census? In previous years, the question about citizenship has appeared on a survey that is only sent to a small percentage of...