Skip to main content

2.1 The Revolving Door


1. According to the research, who is more likely to become a lobbyist, a member of the House or the Senate?
A higher percent Senators retire and become lobbyists. The numbers of the Senate also show more of a oscillating pattern because there are fewer Senators retiring each year, making small changes quite influential on the percentages.
2. Why were Congressmen less likely to become lobbyists in the 1970s and 1980s?
Lobbying in general was much less popular and lucrative, and it only really grew starting in the 1990s.
3. Why does this research likely underestimate the revolving door?
They can only track the number of registered lobbyists, but there are many who do work that is almost identical to the tasks of lobbyists but are not registered.
4. Why do you think committee chairmen are more likely to become lobbyists?  
They have more experience working with a variety of lawmakers and are better at pushing policies than congressmen who tended to follow rather than lead.
5. Does the author think that registration requirements help prevent former Congressmen from lobbying?  Why?

Tightening restrictions may slightly discourage them from becoming lobbyists, but the effect is small. People determined to act as lobbyists will find positions to do so that do not require registering.


6. What is the difference in money spent on lobbying between "public interest lobbies" and corporations?
Corporations spend significantly more, $34 for every $1. Corporations need more money to hire the experienced former Congress members among other spending items.

7. Which of those two groups are the Congressmen more likely to work for?   Why?
They tend to lobby for corporations because they receive high rates from the corporations.

article: https://www.vox.com/2016/1/15/10775788/revolving-door-lobbying

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.3 Media Coverage of Trump

1. What three observations did the study find about media outlets with a right leaning audience? These media outlets hard reporters who were less likely to challenge what the president said, offered fewer negative and more positive evaluations of Trump, and used fewer types of sources for the reporting. 2. How did right leaning media outlets and left leaning media outlets use sources differently? The right leaning media tends not to use Trump and his administration, outside experts, or interest groups. On the other hand, left leaning audience outlets used a variety of sources, with 70% containing two or more types of sources. 3. How much more likely were left leaning outlets to include negative coverage of Trump? Left leaning outlets were three times more likely to cover Trump negatively compared to right leaning sources. 4. How often did left leaning and right leaning outlets refute something said by Trump? It was 7 times more common in left leaning outlets than in...
Post a Comment
Read more

1.7 Does Campaigning Work?

1.  What was the overall general finding of Broockman and Kalla’s analysis of campaign activities? Campaigning basically has no effect on people's general election choices. 2.  What two time frames did Broockman and Kalla analyze in their study? They looked at within 2 months of the election and also at longer than 2 months before the election. 3.  At what rate did they find that people were actually persuaded with campaign activities close to the election? The rate was about 1 in 800 people reached was persuaded. This is almost 0. 4. How were the results different in the study between activities months before the election, and those that occur close to the election day? Campaigning has almost no chance of persuading people when it is close to the election because almost everyone has already decided who to vote for, often based on parties, and cannot be moved by  these methods. Earlier, campaigns are more effective in changing opinions, but ...
Post a Comment
Read more

4.3 This Week in Civil Rights

1. What question will be added to the Census in 2020? It will ask people to say which people in the household are citizens. 2. How does the government justify this addition? They say it will give more information about the United States. 3. Why do people have a problem with this addition? It could decrease the responses of people who are immigrants, particularly those who are not legal residents, of the United States and thus give an inaccurate count of population while allocating funding and determining congressional districts. 4. Why is it important to states that the undocumented immigrants that live there answer the Census? 5. What limit is put on the Census bureau to prevent the problems people are concerned about? 6. How are both critics of Trump and the Trump administration technically correct about this particular question on the Census? In previous years, the question about citizenship has appeared on a survey that is only sent to a small percentage of...
Post a Comment
Read more