Skip to main content

1.6 Free Speech Week


1. Why do conservatives want to hold this event at Cal-Berkeley?
Perhaps they hope to change the minds of an audience that will listen to the ideas presented by the Free Speech Week speakers. More likely, they want to hold it at this school because it is considered a highly liberal environment that strongly rejects conservative ideas, so conservatives expect retaliation that will make their opponents look bad.
2. What is the initial position a public university should take when they get a request to host a speaker?
They should allow them regardless of the speaker and how he or she is seen. They then need to consider the logistics of the requested location and time.
3. What are "content neutral" rules?
These regulations prevent officials from telling the organizers to change their plans based on what point of view they are presenting. The decision must be based on other logical factors such as the capacity of the requested space.
4. In what ways might there be conflict between school officials and the group requesting to speak over the site of the event?
Officials may offer alternatives to the original location that seem worse, or are really worse, than the group's initial choice due to scheduling conflict with a class or on the basis that the speaking event would draw too many people to fit in the requested location. Thus, the group may feel like they are being discriminated against due to their viewpoint.
5. What financial issues might the speaking group have to be responsible for?
They would need to pay for security.
6. What happens if the group cannot pay this additional cost?
Most people believe the city or school where the event is happening should cover the cost.
7. What restrictions are legal concerning what the speaker can actually say?
The speaker cannot incite immediate illegal action, such as by directing the audience to attack someone, and the speaker cannot protest if the police shuts down the event because it is too large and unruly.
8. What can the crowd do to limit the speakers?
The crowd can shout or boo as the speaker tries to address the audience.
9. Under what circumstances can the police shut down the entire event?
If violence breaks out, the police can shut down the event even if it was not directly provoked by the speaker. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4.6 New Secretary of State

1. How is the Senate Foreign Relations Committee divided between Democrats and Republicans? There are 11 Republicans and 10 Democrats. All 10 Democrats and 1 Republican have said they will vote against Pompey. 2. Why is it divided that way? (not in the article, from your brain) The ratio between the parties of committee members reflects the ratio of full Congress. 3. Why is Pompeo in danger of not getting the approval of the committee if there are more Republicans? The committee knows that other Republicans will support him anyway and bring him for a vote of the entire Senate. 4. What will happen if the Committee votes against him?  Can he still become Secretary of State? The Committee's vote is more symbolic endorsement because he will be confirmed by the entire Senate's vote. He can still become Secretary of State because in the Senate, the Republicans have the majority, and two Democrats have said they will vote for him. 5. Why are the two Democrats pl...

3.5 Trump and Circuit Courts

1. Where do the district court and appellate court fit into the organization of the federal courts?  The district court is the lowest level of the federal courts, and it serves as a trial court. The appellate court is the next level up, and it handles appeals from the district court. 2. What makes the 9th Circuit stand out from the other circuit courts? It tends to have liberal rulings that are often reversed by the Supreme Court if appealed. 3. What historical cause may make this Circuit Court more liberal than others? 15 out of the 23 judges in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals were appointed by Democrat Jimmy Carter. 4. Give two examples of very liberal decisions that have come from judges on this court. Stephen Reinhardt wrote the opinions that ruled the Second Amendment doesn't recognize an individual right to bear arms and participated in the ruling that said the Pledge of Allegiance includes unconstitutional endorsement of religion with the words "und...

4.3 This Week in Civil Rights

1. What question will be added to the Census in 2020? It will ask people to say which people in the household are citizens. 2. How does the government justify this addition? They say it will give more information about the United States. 3. Why do people have a problem with this addition? It could decrease the responses of people who are immigrants, particularly those who are not legal residents, of the United States and thus give an inaccurate count of population while allocating funding and determining congressional districts. 4. Why is it important to states that the undocumented immigrants that live there answer the Census? 5. What limit is put on the Census bureau to prevent the problems people are concerned about? 6. How are both critics of Trump and the Trump administration technically correct about this particular question on the Census? In previous years, the question about citizenship has appeared on a survey that is only sent to a small percentage of...