Skip to main content

1.5 What Happened (with the Voters)


1. How popular were Clinton and Trump compared to past candidates for president?
They are the least popular candidates on record. Trump is most disliked, and Clinton is second most disliked. The negative attitudes toward them led to campaigns where each candidate tried to make people hate the other candidate more rather than like him or herself more.
2. How much did minor party voting increase from 2012 to 2016?
It increased significantly, with Stein and Johnson receiving shares of votes that were over 3 times more than in 2012.
3. How did Clinton's negative attacks on Trump, combined with minor party candidates, end up hurting her?
These factors influenced people who preferred her to Trump to vote for the third party candidates instead.
4. How did Trump compare to Romney in 2012 among white voters?
Trump did a little worse than Romney, pulling in 58% of the white voters compared to Romney's 59%.
5. How did Clinton compare to Obama in 2012 among the different groups of nonwhite voters?
While Clinton still held the majority of all minority voters, she did worse than Obama had among all the nonwhite voter groups.
6. How did college educated voters vote in 2016?
They were more likely to vote for Clinton than for Trump.
7. What was unusual about the choices of both major parties in the 2016 election?
Both Clinton and Trump were already well known and came to be disliked by the end of the elections.
8. What's wrong with attributing Trump's victory to racism?
He actually lost white voters compared to Romney and maintained the few black and Latino Republican voters.
9. What's wrong with assumptions that Clinton was wildly popular among women?
While she did have significantly more white college educated female voters, she actually performed slightly worse with women overall compared to Obama.

article: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/9/18/16305486/what-really-happened-in-2016

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.3 Media Coverage of Trump

1. What three observations did the study find about media outlets with a right leaning audience? These media outlets hard reporters who were less likely to challenge what the president said, offered fewer negative and more positive evaluations of Trump, and used fewer types of sources for the reporting. 2. How did right leaning media outlets and left leaning media outlets use sources differently? The right leaning media tends not to use Trump and his administration, outside experts, or interest groups. On the other hand, left leaning audience outlets used a variety of sources, with 70% containing two or more types of sources. 3. How much more likely were left leaning outlets to include negative coverage of Trump? Left leaning outlets were three times more likely to cover Trump negatively compared to right leaning sources. 4. How often did left leaning and right leaning outlets refute something said by Trump? It was 7 times more common in left leaning outlets than in...
Post a Comment
Read more

1.7 Does Campaigning Work?

1.  What was the overall general finding of Broockman and Kalla’s analysis of campaign activities? Campaigning basically has no effect on people's general election choices. 2.  What two time frames did Broockman and Kalla analyze in their study? They looked at within 2 months of the election and also at longer than 2 months before the election. 3.  At what rate did they find that people were actually persuaded with campaign activities close to the election? The rate was about 1 in 800 people reached was persuaded. This is almost 0. 4. How were the results different in the study between activities months before the election, and those that occur close to the election day? Campaigning has almost no chance of persuading people when it is close to the election because almost everyone has already decided who to vote for, often based on parties, and cannot be moved by  these methods. Earlier, campaigns are more effective in changing opinions, but ...
Post a Comment
Read more

4.3 This Week in Civil Rights

1. What question will be added to the Census in 2020? It will ask people to say which people in the household are citizens. 2. How does the government justify this addition? They say it will give more information about the United States. 3. Why do people have a problem with this addition? It could decrease the responses of people who are immigrants, particularly those who are not legal residents, of the United States and thus give an inaccurate count of population while allocating funding and determining congressional districts. 4. Why is it important to states that the undocumented immigrants that live there answer the Census? 5. What limit is put on the Census bureau to prevent the problems people are concerned about? 6. How are both critics of Trump and the Trump administration technically correct about this particular question on the Census? In previous years, the question about citizenship has appeared on a survey that is only sent to a small percentage of...
Post a Comment
Read more